Auteur Theory and Authorship



THE TRIUMPH OF THE DIRECTOR AS AUTEUR

Outside of academic and other serious film writing and teaching, auteurism in relatively uncritical form has been much more obviously triumphant. Perhaps because it was always more critical—and evaluative—than theoretical, early auteurism was very readily assimilated into film journalism, relatively untroubled by later debates about the theoretical basis of authorship. In serious and even popular film journalism it is now generally and quite routinely taken for granted that directors are primarily responsible for films, no matter what country or system they might originate from. The period since the 1960s has been, effectively, the age of the director as superstar. In part, this reflects the triumph of the concept of the "director as auteur " not only in Europe and world cinema, but in commercial cinema—and not least Hollywood—as well. And this is a concept that the film industries themselves—including post-studio Hollywood, with agents putting together star-director-writer packages—have also bought into. The earlier, relatively neutral credit, "Directed by Joe Doakes," is now routinely replaced by "A film by Joe Doakes" or "A Joe Doakes film"—even when this might be Joe Doakes's first film—with legal copyright and "authorship" implications. In some senses, director- auteurs have taken the place of—or become the equal of—stars, cultivating auteur "brands." One has only to think of the ease with which we are invited to consider not only the Pedro Almodóvar or Michael Haneke or François Ozon "brands" but also, in different registers, the Spike Lee, David Lynch, Woody Allen, Martin Scorsese, Francis Ford Coppola, John Sayles, Ridley Scott, or Steven Soderbergh "brands."

SEE ALSO Criticism ; Direction ; France ; Genre ; Great Britain ; Journals and Magazines ; Mise-en-scène ; New Wave

Cameron, Ian. "Films, Directors and Critics," Movie 2 (September 1962): 4–7; reprinted in Movie Reader, edited by Ian Cameron, 12–15. London: November Books; New York: Praeger, 1972.

Caughie, John, ed. Theories of Authorship: A Reader . London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.

Editors of Cahiers du Cinéma . "John Ford's Young Mr Lincoln ." In Movies and Methods: An Anthology , edited by Bill Nichols, vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.

Gerstner, David A., and Janet Staiger, eds. Authorship and Cinema . New York and London: Routledge, 2003.

Graham, Peter, ed. The New Wave . Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968; and London: Secker and Warburg, 1968.

Hillier, Jim, ed. Cahiers du Cinéma: The 1950s: Neo-Realism, Hollywood, New Wave . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

——, ed. Cahiers du Cinéma: 1960–1968: New Wave, New Cinema, Reevaluating Hollywood . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Houston, Penelope. "The Critical Question." Sight & Sound 29, no. 4: (Autumn 1960).

Mast, Gerald, and Marshall Cohen, eds. Film Theory and Criticism . 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.

Perkins, V. F. Film as Film . Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1972.

Sarris, Andrew. The American Cinema: Directors and Directions, 1929–1968 . New York: Dutton, 1968.

Stam, Robert, and Toby Miller, eds. Film and Theory: An Anthology . Malden, MA, and Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2000.

Truffaut, François. "A Certain Tendency of the French Cinema." In Movies and Methods: An Anthology , edited by Bill Nichols, vol. 1, 224–237. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.

Wexman, Virginia Wright, ed. Film and Authorship . New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Rutgers University Press, 2003.

Wollen, Peter. Signs and Meaning in the Cinema . 1969. 2nd ed. London: Secker and Warburg, and Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972.

Jim Hillier



Other articles you might like:

Follow City-Data.com Founder
on our Forum or Twitter

User Contributions:

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA